Because of the overlap between legal systems and political systems, some of the issues in law and economics are also raised in political economyconstitutional economics and political science.
Fifth Amendment Fifth Amendment: Scholars consider the Fifth Amendment as capable of breaking down into the following five distinct constitutional rights: While the Fifth Amendment originally only applied to federal courts, the U.
The right to indictment by the Grand Jury has not been incorporated, while the right against double jeopardy, the right against self-incrimination, and the protection against arbitrary taking of a private property without due compensation have all been incorporated to the states.
Deeply-rooted in the Anglo-American tradition, the grand jury was originally intended to protect the accused from overly-zealous prosecutions by the English monarchy. In the early phases of the development of the U.
Constituion, the Founding Fathers have decided to retain the Grand Jury system as a protection against over-zealous prosecution by the central government. Although the Supreme Court in Hurtado v. California in has refused to incorporate the Grand Jury system to all of the states, most states have independently decided to retain a similar form of Grand Jury, and currently, all but two states Connecticut and Pennsylvania have the grand jury.
Congressional statutes outline Applied business law 1 means by which a federal grand jury shall be impaneled. Ordinarily, Applied business law 1 grand jurors are selected from the pool of prospective jurors who potentially could serve on a given day in any juror capacity.
At common-law, a grand jury consists of between 12 and 23 members. While state legislatures may set the statutory number of grand jurors anywhere within the common-law requirement of 12 to 23, statutes setting the number outside of this range violate the Fifth Amendment.
Federal law has set the federal grand jury number as falling between 16 and A person being charged with a crime that warrants a grand jury has the right to challenge members of the grand juror for partiality or bias, but these challenges differ from peremptory challenges, which a defendant has when choosing a trial jury.
When a defendant makes a peremptory challenge, the judge must remove the juror without making any proof, but in the case of a grand juror challenge, the challenger must establish the cause of the challenge by meeting the same burden of proof as the establishment of any other fact would require.
Grand juries possess broad authority to investigate suspected crimes. They may not, however, conduct "fishing expeditions" or hire individuals not already employed by the government to locate testimony or documents. Ultimately, grand juries may make a presentment, informing the court of their decision to indict or not indict the suspect.
If they indict the suspect, it means they have decided that there is a probable cause to believe that the charged crime has indeed been committed and by the suspect Double Jeopardy The Double Jeopardy Clause aims to protect against the harassment of an individual through successive prosecutions of the same alleged act, to ensure the significance of an acquittal, and to prevent the state from putting the defendant through the emotional, psychological, physical, and financial troubles that would accompany multiple trials for the same alleged offense.
Courts have interpreted the Double Jeopardy Clause as accomplishing these goals by providing the following three distinct rights: Courts, however, have not interpreted the Double Jeopardy Clause as either prohibiting the state from seeking review of a sentence or restricting a sentence's length on rehearing after a defendant's successful appeal.
Jeopardy refers to the danger of conviction. Thus, jeopardy does not attach unless a risk of the determination of guilt exists. Self-Incrimination The Fifth Amendment also protects criminal defendants from having to testify if they may incriminate themselves through the testimony.
A witness may "plead the Fifth" and not answer if the witness believes answering the question may be self-incriminatory. Therefore, any time that law enforcement takes a suspect into custody, law enforcement must make the suspect aware of all rights.
However, courts have since then slightly narrowed the Miranda rights, holding that police interrogations or questioning that occur prior to taking the suspect into custody does not fall within the Miranda requirements, and the police are not required to give the Miranda warnings to the suspects prior to taking them into custody, and their silence in some instances can be deemed to be implicit admission of guilt.
If law enforcement fails to honor these safeguards, courts will often suppress any statements by the suspect as violating the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, provided that the suspect has not actually waived the rights.
An actual waiver occurs when a suspect has made the waiver knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. To determine if a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver has occurred, a court will examine the totality of the circumstances, which considers all pertinent circumstances and events.
The Fifth Amendment right does not extend to an individual's voluntarily prepared business papers because the element of compulsion is lacking. Similarly, the right does not extend to potentially incriminating evidence derived from obligatory reports or tax returns.
Constitution and all applicable statutes before the government can deprive any person of life, liberty, or property. While the Fifth Amendment only applies to the federal government, the identical text in the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies this due process requirement to the states as well.
Courts have come to recognize that two aspects of due process exist: The government does not have to pay a property owner's attorney's fees, however, unless a statute so provides. However, after the Kelo decision, some state legislatures passed statutory amendments to counteract Kelo and expand protection for the condemnees.1 1 A.
The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3.
Applied general qualifications are level 3 qualifications for post students who want to continue their education through applied learning. Qualifications added in September are marked with. 1 1 A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics 1. Meta-ethics 2. Normative Ethics 3. Applied Ethics 2 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions about the nature of. Reply to martyburbanklaw's Post: Can two individuals who have just applied for a federal employer ID # XXXXX called a corporation, or set-up as a non-profit under a fictious name legally do business without filing with resident state or resident city and do business in a another state collecting $65,
Applied Ethics 2 B. Meta-ethics consists in the attempt to answer the fundamental philosophical questions about the nature of.
Applied general qualifications are level 3 qualifications for post students who want to continue their education through applied learning. Qualifications added in September are marked with.
Business&ITCenter Business Law This module provides an understanding of illegal and unethical behaviors and the consequences of those actions in business scenarios.
Students discover where laws come from, how they impact businesses, and the types of legal business entities.
- Because the field of Business Law is so great, this paper will examine a single aspect of Business Law, that of antitrust action. Specifically, as it is applied to Microsoft, antitrust litigation is raising eyebrows in both the legal and business worlds. Law books. Our free online law books provide students with a unique view on the subject of evidence, proof and justice.
You can also check out law for computing students, business students and sports law. Kimberly Miller Applied Business Law-1 Week Individual Work 2 When it comes to property leases there is most likely going to be a clause referred to as “Assignments and Sublet” which is an arrangement to set the tenants’ rights either to assign or sublet the property to another party or .